All Releases••

Proprietary release

•

Released September 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Release Intelligence, Performance & Price

Model summary

IntelligenceUpdated

55
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Intelligence.

Performance

Time to first answer token 240.17sOutput speed 139 tok/s
34.1
Time per Intelligence Index task (minutes)
4 out of 4 units for Performance.

Cost

In $2.00Out $10.00Cache discount 95%
$10.02
Cost per Intelligence Index task
4 out of 4 units for Cost.

Verbosity

Input tokens 30.6BOutput/input 1.095%
335M
Output tokens from Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Verbosity.

The Claude Sonnet 5.5 release offers 5 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across the 5 models.

  • For intelligence, the top model of Claude Sonnet 5.5 is Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) at 55.
  • For speed, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at 2.5 min has the lowest time per task.
  • For latency, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at 2.73s offers the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at $0.51 offers the lowest cost per task. Prices vary up to 20x across models.

Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Pareto line

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Speed & Latency

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
See more

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

1 - hallucination rate

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Physics reasoning

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo

MLCR-AAUpdated

Medical long context reasoning

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

Use of filler and generic language

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Personality Indexes

Each axis is one of 8 personality indexes: the mean of its traits’ Elo z-scores, percentile ranked from 1 to 100 across all models evaluated in the benchmark

More from Anthropic

Further details

Weights
Provider Benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
55
-
1M
$1.47
34.1
139
Not available
AnthropicMicrosoft AzureAmazon BedrockGoogle
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
50
-
1M
$1.47
14.7
139
Not available
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
42
-
1M
$1.47
6.9
142
Not available
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
31
-
1M
$1.47
3.8
136
Not available
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)
Anthropic logoAnthropic
26
-
1M
$1.47
2.5
139
Not available
GoogleAnthropicAmazon BedrockMicrosoft Azure